Advisory for:Occupational Health & HR

Clinical Safety & Compliance for Occupational Health & HR Technology

The Challenge

Where occupational health teams get exposed

 Employers and HR technology providers deploying health assessment tools in the workplace face a compliance landscape that is more complex than most legal or HR teams realise. Tools that screen for neurodevelopmental conditions, assess mental health, or inform reasonable adjustment decisions under the Equality Act 2010 carry clinical risk obligations that require proper documentation, clinical oversight, and in some cases MHRA registration. Getting this wrong does not just create regulatory exposure. It creates employment tribunal risk.

Unclear whether workplace assessment tools are medical devices
No clinical safety documentation for health-adjacent HR tools
Equality Act obligations not mapped to tool deployment decisions
Neurodivergent employee screening without clinical governance
HR teams lacking confidence in their legal obligations

Our Deliverables

What we help occupational health and HR teams with

Efficiency
Regulatory Clarity

Establishing the regulatory status of your tools before deployment.

Operations
Clinical Governance

Building the documentation and oversight framework your deployment requires.

Future Readiness
Compliance Advisory

Ongoing advisory as your tools and obligations evolve.

Automation examples

See what's possible

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CLASSIFICATION
Workplace Tool Regulatory Review
INPUTS
HR technology platform with health assessment features
ACTION
Classify
Risk Profile
Compliance Map
RESULT
HR TECHNOLOGY
DCB0129
Clinical Safety Documentation
INPUTS
Neurodevelopmental screening tool for employer deployment
ACTION
Scope
Hazard Log
Safety Case
Sign-off
RESULT
EMPLOYER
EQUALITY ACT
Reasonable Adjustment Framework
INPUTS
Employer deploying neurodivergent screening across workforce
ACTION
Map Obligations
Framework Design
Policy Advisory
RESULT

Typical outcomes

The impact of clinical governance in the workplace

~750%

increase in

employment

tribunal cases citing ADHD since 2020 — clinical governance is no longer optional for employers deploying health tools

~28%

of HR

teams

report confidence in their Equality Act obligations for neurodivergent employees — SDHA closes that gap

“Employers deploying health assessment tools in the workplace are operating in a clinical risk environment, the ones who build the governance framework first are the ones who stay out of tribunals.”

Dr Jide Idowu, Founder, SDHA

SaMD classification review for a workplace wellbeing platform with embedded mental health assessment features. Regulatory status confirmed, MHRA pathway mapped, and clinical risk documentation built before enterprise deployment.

DCB0129 clinical safety documentation for a neurodevelopmental pre-screening tool deployed across a 5,000-person workforce. Hazard log, safety case, and CSO sign-off completed before rollout.

Reasonable adjustment framework designed for a FTSE 250 employer following a significant increase in neurodivergent employee disclosures. Policy framework, line manager guidance, and clinical governance structure all delivered within six weeks.

Connect with an Expert

Let's map your compliance pathway

Tell us about your product and where you are in the process. We will identify your obligations and recommend the right next step.